Great Lakes Protection Fund Grant

Great Lakes Protection Fund

Suggest an update

Grant amount: US $20,000 - US $1,600,000

Deadline: Rolling

Applicant type: Nonprofit For-Profit Business Government Entity College / University Individuals

Funding uses: Research, Project / Program

Location of project: Canada, Michigan, Lake County, Illinois, Counties in Indiana: Adams County, Allen County Show all

Location of residency: United States

View website    Save Need help writing this grant?



  • We strongly encourage you to contact our program staff to discuss an idea, whether fully formed or not, to begin the application process.
  • As a matter of course, we accept preproposals at any time.
  • As a matter of course, the Projects and Grant Making Committee meets quarterly to evaluate preproposals.
    • Final funding decisions are made by the full board at its March, June, September and December meetings.
  • Typically conversations about a project idea begin two months before a preproposal is submitted. If successful, you can receive an award within six to eight months after submitting a preproposal.

The Great Lakes Protection Fund welcomes ideas for projects that will create and advance the next generation of actions to protect and restore the ecological health of the Great Lakes.

As Great Lakes issues evolve, so do our investments. The themes which we explore and seek advice shift; we find new areas to enter and make investments; and we exit those areas when we feel our funded strategies have sustainable momentum.

Below are themes we are currently exploring. Please review them for ideas but they should not necessarily limit what you should consider proposing. We are interested in your innovative approaches.

Funding Guidelines

The Fund is a mission-based investor. The ultimate criterion used to select projects is the anticipated benefit to the health of the Great Lakes ecosystem.

To that end, projects must meet several criteria.

Meaningful Ecological Outcomes

Projects must identify ecological improvements that are real, significant and of regional consequence.

Here is what we mean:

Real improvements are results that can be measured and are growing in the ecosystem. This is achieved through actions. Results are measured by outcomes on the ground and in the water.

Significant improvements target physical, chemical and/or biological impairment issues that currently are unaddressed. This is achieved through strategies that reframe a key issue or behavior and that often energetically capitalize on big changes underway in society, the economics of the activity, or the underlying science involved.

Improvements of regional consequence are system-wide environmental outcomes. This is achieved through strategies that employ compelling pilot demonstrations that make a path to scale inevitable.

A Collaborative Team

The Fund supports teams that include all of the parties connected with the issue. Collaboration for us means the participation of not only the designers, implementers, experts and advisors, but also the naysayers and the end users who are most likely to take the results and make a difference.

Solution Focus and Action Orientation

The Fund supports projects that take concrete actions to prototype new approaches to Great Lakes problems. Actions taken at a specific place in the basin serve as a demonstration, not a result. The most impactful teams learn by doing, and adapt based on what they have learned.

Actions are just that—activities that teams try on the land or in the water to solve a regional problem. The Fund is interested in several categories of actions:

  • Actions can be a modification of a current approach or a unique application of a technique to a different setting;
  • Actions can test approaches in an area where no one has yet acted; or
  • Actions can be activities that change the economics of a product, market or industry.

A Strategy for System-wide Change

Projects must have a compelling strategy to drive change at the scale necessary to create basin-wide impact. Successful teams empower those who will take the next set of actions by using market forces, new social norms, and systemic change to take their work to scale.

Scientific Rigor

Projects must be based in sound science, utilize the results of existing research and apply the skills of the scientific community. The Fund will only support scientific or policy research that is part of a larger action strategy.

You can learn more about this opportunity by visiting the funder's website.


  • The Great Lakes Protection Fund can support a wide variety of applicants based in the United States or internationally.
    • non-profit organizations
    • universities
    • governmental agencies
    • individuals
    • for-profit businesses
  • The applicant does not need to be located within the Great Lakes region to be eligible. However, the proposed project concept must identify positive environmental impact to the Great Lakes basin ecosystem.
  • Government agencies must show that Fund support is not being used to replace or duplicate public funds.
  • The Fund is able to employ a variety of funding instruments including cash grants, convertible grants, debt, equity or some combination. 


  • The governors of the Great Lakes states have asked the Fund’s board to keep innovations in sustainable water management as a top Fund priority.
  • Our funding guidelines help bridge the governors’ nine priority areas (presented to Congress) to the ongoing discovery of catalytic solutions for the Great Lakes. Those priorities are:
    • Ensure the sustainable use of our water resources while confirming that the States retain authority over water use and diversions of Great Lakes waters.
    • Promote programs to protect human health against adverse effects of pollution in the Great Lakes ecosystem.
    • Continue to reduce the introduction of persistent bioaccumulative toxics into the Great Lakes ecosystem.
    • Stop the introduction and spread of non-native aquatic invasive species.
    • Enhance fish and wildlife by restoring and protecting coastal wetlands, fish and wildlife habitats.
    • Restore to environmental health the Areas of Concern identified by the International Joint Commission as needing remediation.
    • Control pollution from diffuse sources into water, land and air.
    • Standardize and enhance the methods by which information is collected, recorded and shared within the region.
    • Adopt sustainable use practices that protect environmental resources and may enhance the recreational and commercial value of our Great Lakes.
  • The Fund supports the governors’ shared vision to test new ways to improve the physical, chemical, and biological integrity of the region’s waters, making the Great Lakes more valuable and the states more prosperous.


  • The Fund does not provide support for the following categories of activities:
    • general operating support
    • advocacy
    • lobbying
    • litigation
    • compliance obligations
    • land acquisition
    • public works projects